Re: [PATCH 09/10] net: phy: Add MDIO driver for Juniper's SAM FPGA

[Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:18:37PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> From: Georgi Vlaev <gvlaev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add driver for the MDIO IP block present in Juniper's
> SAM FPGA.
> 
> This driver supports only Clause 45 of the 802.3 spec.
> 
> Note that due to the fact that there are no drivers for
> Broadcom/Avago retimers on 10/40Ge path that are controlled
> from the MDIO interface there is a method to have direct
> access to registers via a debugfs interface.

This seems to be the wrong solution. Why not write those drivers?

Controlling stuff from user space is generally frowned up. So i expect
DaveM will NACK this patch. Please remove all the debugfs stuff.

> +static int mdio_sam_stat_wait(struct mii_bus *bus, u32 wait_mask)
> +{
> +	struct mdio_sam_data *data = bus->priv;
> +	unsigned long timeout;
> +	u32 stat;
> +
> +	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MDIO_RDY_TMO);
> +	do {
> +		stat = ioread32(data->base + MDIO_STATUS);
> +		if (stat & wait_mask)
> +			return 0;
> +
> +		usleep_range(50, 100);
> +	} while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
> +
> +	return -EBUSY;

I've recently had to fix a loop like this in another
driver. usleep_range(50, 100) can sleep for a lot longer. If it sleeps
for MDIO_RDY_TMO you exit out with -EBUSY after a single iteration,
which is not what you want. It is better to make a fixed number of
iterations rather than a timeout.

> +}
> +
> +static int mdio_sam_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int regnum)
> +{
> +	struct mdio_sam_data *data = bus->priv;
> +	u32 command, res;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* mdiobus_read holds the bus->mdio_lock mutex */
> +
> +	if (!(regnum & MII_ADDR_C45))
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	ret = mdio_sam_stat_wait(bus, STAT_REG_RDY);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	command = regnum & 0x1fffff; /* regnum = (dev_id << 16) | reg */
> +	command |= ((phy_id & 0x1f) << 21);
> +
> +	iowrite32(command, data->base + MDIO_CMD1);
> +	ioread32(data->base + MDIO_CMD1);


> +	iowrite32(CMD2_READ | CMD2_ENABLE, data->base + MDIO_CMD2);
> +	ioread32(data->base + MDIO_CMD2);

Why do you need to read the values back? Hardware bug?

> +	iowrite32(TBL_CMD_REG_GO, data->base + MDIO_TBL_CMD);
> +	ioread32(data->base + MDIO_TBL_CMD);

Although not wrong, most drivers use writel().

> +
> +	usleep_range(50, 100);
> +
> +	ret = mdio_sam_stat_wait(bus, (STAT_REG_DONE | STAT_REG_ERR));

Do you really need a wait before calling mdio_sam_stat_wait()? Isn't
that what it is supposed to do, wait...

> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	res = ioread32(data->base + MDIO_RESULT);
> +
> +	if (res & RES_ERROR || !(res & RES_SUCCESS))
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	return (res & 0xffff);
> +}
> +
> +static int mdio_sam_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int regnum, u16 val)
> +{
> +	struct mdio_sam_data *data = bus->priv;
> +	u32 command;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* mdiobus_write holds the bus->mdio_lock mutex */
> +
> +	if (!(regnum & MII_ADDR_C45))
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	ret = mdio_sam_stat_wait(bus, STAT_REG_RDY);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	command = regnum & 0x1fffff; /* regnum = (dev_id << 16) | reg */
> +	command |= ((phy_id & 0x1f) << 21);
> +
> +	iowrite32(command, data->base + MDIO_CMD1);
> +	ioread32(data->base + MDIO_CMD1);
> +	iowrite32(CMD2_ENABLE | val, data->base + MDIO_CMD2);
> +	ioread32(data->base + MDIO_CMD2);
> +	iowrite32(TBL_CMD_REG_GO, data->base + MDIO_TBL_CMD);
> +	ioread32(data->base + MDIO_TBL_CMD);
> +
> +	usleep_range(50, 100);
> +
> +	ret = mdio_sam_stat_wait(bus, (STAT_REG_DONE | STAT_REG_ERR));
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mdio_sam_reset(struct mii_bus *bus)
> +{
> +	struct mdio_sam_data *data = bus->priv;
> +
> +	iowrite32(TBL_CMD_SOFT_RESET, data->base + MDIO_TBL_CMD);
> +	ioread32(data->base + MDIO_TBL_CMD);
> +	mdelay(10);
> +	iowrite32(0, data->base + MDIO_TBL_CMD);
> +	ioread32(data->base + MDIO_TBL_CMD);
> +
> +	/* zero tables */
> +	memset_io(data->base + MDIO_CMD1, 0, 0x1000);
> +	memset_io(data->base + MDIO_PRI_CMD1, 0, 0x1000);

What tables?

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mdio_sam_of_register_bus(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +				    struct device_node *np, void __iomem *base)
> +{
> +	struct mii_bus *bus;
> +	struct mdio_sam_data *data;
> +	u32 reg;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	bus = devm_mdiobus_alloc_size(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data));
> +	if (!bus)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/* bus offset */
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &reg);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	data = bus->priv;
> +	data->base = base + reg;
> +
> +	bus->parent = &pdev->dev;
> +	bus->name = "mdio-sam";
> +	bus->read = mdio_sam_read;
> +	bus->write = mdio_sam_write;
> +	bus->reset = mdio_sam_reset;
> +	snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "mdiosam-%x-%x", pdev->id, reg);
> +
> +	ret = of_mdiobus_register(bus, np);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> +	ret = mdio_sam_debugfs_init(bus);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto err_unregister;
> +#endif
> +	ret = device_create_bin_file(&bus->dev, &bin_attr_raw_io);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_debugfs;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_debugfs:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> +	mdio_sam_debugfs_remove(bus);
> +#endif
> +err_unregister:
> +	mdiobus_unregister(bus);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int mdio_sam_of_unregister_bus(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	struct mii_bus *bus;
> +
> +	bus = of_mdio_find_bus(np);
> +	if (bus) {
> +		device_remove_bin_file(&bus->dev, &bin_attr_raw_io);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> +		mdio_sam_debugfs_remove(bus);
> +#endif
> +		mdiobus_unregister(bus);
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mdio_sam_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	base = devm_ioremap_nocache(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> +				    resource_size(res));

Why nocache?

> +	if (IS_ERR(base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(base);
> +
> +	for_each_available_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, np) {
> +		ret = mdio_sam_of_register_bus(pdev, np, base);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto err;
> +	}

This is odd. There does not seem to be any shared resources. So you
should really have one MDIO bus as one device in the device tree.



       Andrew

> +
> +	return 0;
> +err:
> +	/* roll back everything */
> +	for_each_available_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, np)
> +		mdio_sam_of_unregister_bus(np);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int mdio_sam_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +
> +	for_each_available_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, np)
> +		mdio_sam_of_unregister_bus(np);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id mdio_sam_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "jnx,mdio-sam" },
> +	{  }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mdio_sam_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver mdio_sam_driver = {
> +	.probe = mdio_sam_probe,
> +	.remove = mdio_sam_remove,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "mdio-sam",
> +		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +		.of_match_table = mdio_sam_of_match,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(mdio_sam_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:mdio-sam");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Georgi Vlaev <gvlaev@xxxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Juniper Networks SAM MDIO bus driver");
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html