Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] gpio: pca953x: make the define names consistent

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 12:48 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> The register offset defines for the pca953x and pca957x expander
> families should have the same names to better reflect their similar
> purposes.



 
>  	chip->regs = &pca957x_regs;
>  
> -	ret = pca953x_read_regs(chip, PCA957X_OUT, chip->reg_output);
> +	ret = pca953x_read_regs(chip, PCA957X_OUTPUT, chip-
> >reg_output);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out;
> -	ret = pca953x_read_regs(chip, PCA957X_CFG, chip-
> >reg_direction);
> +	ret = pca953x_read_regs(chip, PCA957X_DIRECTION, chip-
> >reg_direction);

Bu we may use chip->regs->direction here, right? And output before. 

>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out;
>  

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html