Re: [PATCH 2/5] gpio: pca953x: code shrink

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There are multiple places in the driver code where a
> switch (chip->chip_type) is used to determine the proper register
> offset.
>
> Unduplicate the code by adding a simple structure holding the possible
> offsets that differ between the pca953x and pca957x chip families and
> use it to avoid the checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

This doesn't apply beacuse of other changes made to the driver by
Phil Reid et al.

Can you please rebase your work on top of my gpio "devel" branch:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git/log/?h=devel
and at the same time fix Geert's reported const thing?

I'm overall happy with the patch series and would like to apply
also patches 2-5 for v4.9 soon.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html