Re: [RFC PATCH] pinctrl: Add SX150X GPIO Extender Pinctrl Driver

[Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2016-09-06 10:20, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi Linus, Peter,
> 
> On 09/06/2016 08:44 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> I intend to test this, but it might be a couple of days. I need
>> to bring the damn thing out of the closet and find the right
>> cables etc etc. And I of course have other stuff to do as well...
> 
> Is it a DT only platform you intent to test with ? In this case the current version is OK.

Yes, it's DT-only, but I don't expect it to be compatible as I linked
the wrong patch, see below...

*snip*

>> No, we have not, because we depend on yet to be upstreamed drivers
>> for all of our boards, sometimes written by us, sometimes from
>> the CPU vendor. For this driver, we were using a rejected patch
>> to configure the pins from DT in the gpio driver written by
>> Wei Chen [1] 
> 
> Actually it seems the patch was accepted, but it is not enough to handle
> DT completely since the gpio base is incorrect, this was the subject
> of my previous patch [2], make is DT compliant even for IRQ management.
> But having a pinctrl version seens far more reasonable.

Oh crap, wrong link... Here's a better one:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5437921/

>> One thing I noted at the very end of the patch was that I on
>> first glance did not see any i2c_del_driver call, maybe use the
>> module_i2c_driver macro?
> 
> Well, it's not present in the gpio version and since it manages IRQs, I assume it was
> decided to not use is as a module since it's needed to attach very early.

I just noted the omission, someone else will shirley know better than
me about what to do about it...

(BTW, we're not using interrupts)

Cheers,
Peter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html