On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Lucile Quirion <lucile.quirion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This driver is generic and aims to support all Technologic Systems's > boards embedding FPGA GPIOs with an I2C interface. > > This driver supports TS-4900, TS-7970, TS-7990 and TS-4100 series. > > Signed-off-by: Lucile Quirion <lucile.quirion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (...) > +static int ts4900_gpio_write(struct i2c_client *client, u16 addr, u8 data) > +{ > + struct i2c_msg msg; > + u8 buf[3]; > + int ret; > + > + buf[0] = addr >> 8; > + buf[1] = addr & 0xFF; > + buf[2] = data; > + > + msg.addr = client->addr; > + msg.flags = 0; > + msg.len = 3; > + msg.buf = buf; > + > + ret = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, &msg, 1); > + if (ret != 1) { > + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: write error, ret=%d\n", > + __func__, ret); > + return -EIO; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int ts4900_gpio_read(struct i2c_client *client, u16 addr) > +{ > + struct i2c_msg msgs[2]; > + u8 buf[2]; > + int ret; > + > + buf[0] = addr >> 8; > + buf[1] = addr & 0xFF; > + > + msgs[0].addr = client->addr; > + msgs[0].flags = 0; > + msgs[0].len = 2; > + msgs[0].buf = buf; > + > + msgs[1].addr = client->addr; > + msgs[1].flags = I2C_M_RD; > + msgs[1].len = 1; > + msgs[1].buf = buf; > + > + ret = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msgs, ARRAY_SIZE(msgs)); > + if (ret != ARRAY_SIZE(msgs)) { > + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: read error, ret=%d\n", > + __func__, ret); > + return -EIO; > + } > + > + return buf[0]; > +} It appears that you can very clearly replace this stuff with an I2C regmap. If you look in drivers/base/regmap/regmap-i2c.c you can see that you're just reimplementing regmaps marshalling. Look at other drivers using I2C regmap for inspiration, e.g. drivers/mfd/stw481x.c. select REGMAP_I2C #include <linux/regmap.h> and start by implementing devm_regmap_init_i2c() etc. > +static int __ts4900_gpio_direction_output(struct i2c_client *client, int gpio, > + int value) I don't like __prefixed functions. Come up with a better name. > +{ > + u8 reg = 0; > + > + if (value) > + reg = TS4900_GPIO_OD | TS4900_GPIO_OE; > + else > + reg = TS4900_GPIO_OE; > + > + return ts4900_gpio_write(client, gpio, reg); > +} TS4900_GPIO_OD sounds like you can switch the output between push-pull and open drain and here you are just open coding all outputs to be open drain. That is confusing. For controlling open drain implement .set_single_ended() in the GPIO chip and let consumers explicitly request that they want their line open drain. If "OD" does not mean open drain it is extremely confusing but OK then I am wrong... > +static int ts4900_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, > + unsigned int offset) > +static int ts4900_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, > + unsigned int offset, int value) Also implement ts4900_gpio_get_direction() > +static int ts4900_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) > +{ > + struct ts4900_gpio_priv *priv = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + int ret; > + u8 reg; > + > + reg = ts4900_gpio_read(priv->client, offset); > + > + ret = (reg & priv->input_bit) ? 1 : 0; > + > + return ret; Just replace the two last lines with: return !!(reg & priv->input_bit); > +static void ts4900_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, > + int value) > +{ > + struct ts4900_gpio_priv *priv = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + > + __ts4900_gpio_direction_output(priv->client, offset, value); > +} Why should you always set the direction to output when setting an output value? It doesn't make sense. Make the functions do one thing. .direction_output() sets an output value at the same time, but .set() should not force the line as output. (...) > + ret = gpiochip_add_data(&priv->gpio_chip, priv); Use devm_gpiochip_add_data() > +static int ts4900_gpio_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > +{ > + struct ts4900_gpio_priv *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client); > + > + gpiochip_remove(&priv->gpio_chip); > + > + return 0; > +} Then this is not needed at all (handled by devm*) Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html