On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 02:30:46PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > It seems intel_gpio_irq_wake() misses lock protection against I/O flow. > Use spin lock here as well. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: Protect set wake flow by spin lock
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: Protect set wake flow by spin lock
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:59:45 +0300
- In-reply-to: <1467977446-73452-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <1467977446-73452-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: Protect set wake flow by spin lock
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: Protect set wake flow by spin lock
- Prev by Date: [GIT PULL] final GPIO fixes for v4.7
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio: merrifield: Introduce GPIO driver to support Merrifield
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: Protect set wake flow by spin lock
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: Protect set wake flow by spin lock
- Index(es):
 |