On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As we're not dealing with a v4.7 regression that would need to be applied this > week, can't you propose a proper fix instead of a revert ? AFAICT the proper fix is to simply move the gpiod_request() sites earlier, I can propose something if that's all right? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:54:36 +0200
- In-reply-to: <58708801.29lRIIaT3y@avalon>
- References: <1467563525-30227-1-git-send-email-johan@kernel.org> <58708801.29lRIIaT3y@avalon>
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
- From: Johan Hovold
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
- From: Laurent Pinchart
- [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7792: add EtherAVB pin groups
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
- Index(es):
 |