On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This reverts commit 923b93e451db876d1479d3e4458fce14fec31d1c. > > Make sure consumers do not overwrite gpio flags for pins that have > already been claimed. Patch applied for fixes and pushed for build server for testing for now. It looks innocent to me. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:54:08 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1467563525-30227-1-git-send-email-johan@kernel.org>
- References: <1467563525-30227-1-git-send-email-johan@kernel.org>
- References:
- [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
- From: Johan Hovold
- [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: free handles in fringe cases
- Next by Date: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"
- Index(es):
 |