RE: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband bridge support driver for Intel SOC's

["Tan, Jui Nee" <jui.nee.tan@xxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mika Westerberg [mailto:mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:24 PM
> To: Tan, Jui Nee <jui.nee.tan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxxxxx;
> hpa@xxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; ptyser@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>; Yong,
> Jonathan <jonathan.yong@xxxxxxxxx>; Yu, Ong Hock
> <ong.hock.yu@xxxxxxxxx>; Voon, Weifeng <weifeng.voon@xxxxxxxxx>; Wan
> Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie
> <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband
> bridge support driver for Intel SOC's
> 
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:03:20AM +0000, Tan, Jui Nee wrote:
> > > Maybe, or make it modular and use MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, ...)
> > > to match the corresponding CPUs.
> >
> > We need CONFIG_X86_INTEL_NON_ACPI Kconfig option to select
> CONFIG_PINCTRL.
> > This is to solve kbuidbot complaint about kernel configuration, i.e.
> > CONFIG_PINCTRL=n. Appreciate if you could advise something on this.
> 
> Good point.
> 
> Then I guess you might add similar Kconfig option but can you call it
> something else than CONFIG_X86_INTEL_NON_ACPI. Perhaps something
> that relates to the actual product so distro people can then decide whether
> they want to support it or not. Along the lines of CONFIG_X86_INTEL_CE and
> so on.
Thanks for your suggestion. CONFIG_X86_INTEL_NON_ACPI will be renamed
to CONFIG_X86_INTEL_APL in next patch-set.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html