On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 01:40 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Documentation incorrectly refers to struct pinctrl_desc, where no such > flag is > available. Replace the name of the struct. > + Fixes: commit 8c4c2016345f ("pinctrl: move strict option to pinmux_ops") > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/pinctrl.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt > index 4976389e..dd15a69 100644 > --- a/Documentation/pinctrl.txt > +++ b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt > @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ separate memory range only intended for GPIO > driving, and the register > range dealing with pin config and pin multiplexing get placed into a > different memory range and a separate section of the data sheet. > > -A flag "strict" in struct pinctrl_desc is available to check and deny > +A flag "strict" in struct pinmux_ops is available to check and deny > simultaneous access to the same pin from GPIO and pin multiplexing > consumers on hardware of this type. The pinctrl driver should set > this flag > accordingly. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html