On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > These are input-only pins. They do not support drive controlling > in the first place. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: uniphier: fix meaningless drive control offsets
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: uniphier: fix meaningless drive control offsets
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:03:37 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1465978686-28578-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
- References: <1465978686-28578-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <1465978686-28578-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
- References:
- [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: uniphier: two more fixes for UniPhier pin data
- From: Masahiro Yamada
- [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: uniphier: fix meaningless drive control offsets
- From: Masahiro Yamada
- [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: uniphier: two more fixes for UniPhier pin data
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: uniphier: prohibit drive control for pin 61-66 of PH1-LD11
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: make gpio numbering deterministical by using of aliases
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: uniphier: fix meaningless drive control offsets
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpio: make sure gpiod_to_irq() returns negative on NULL desc
- Index(es):
 |