Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: make gpio numbering deterministical by using of aliases

[Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>]

On 06/15/2016 11:27 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [160615 00:27]:
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:56:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> The way forward is to use the character device and use gpiochip
>>> devices with offset indexes and look up GPIOs by name from the
>>> character devices. If nothing substantial happens I am merging the
>>> final pieces of the GPIO chardev ABI for v4.8 and that is doing all that
>>> sysfs was doing and then some. I just need to change a small thing
>>> before sending the final version for review.
>>
>> Hmm, so /sys/class/gpio was obsoleted before the substitution was ready?
>> I'd say an overlapping of several kernel versions would be good as we
>> cannot expect that userspace changes as fast as the kernel.
> 
> Well the /sys/class/gpio is an interface, and we'll have to maintain
> it basically forever as we all know. It also works just fine for simple
> things, so let's make sure it is usable. Having it inconsistent can
> cause nasty side effects upgrading kernels.
> 

Wouldn't gpio-line-names be helpful for such cases as mentioned in [1],[2]
But I don't know it these properties were exposed in legacy GPIO sysfs interface also.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg15040.html
[2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/617713/
 

-- 
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html