[PATCH] pinctrl: imx: Do not treat a PIN without MUX register as an error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Some PINs do not have a MUX register, it is not an error.
It is necessary to allow the continuation of the PINs configuration,
otherwise the whole PIN-group will be configured incorrectly.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c
index 47ccfcc..eccb474 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c
@@ -209,9 +209,9 @@ static int imx_pmx_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector,
 		pin_reg = &info->pin_regs[pin_id];
 
 		if (pin_reg->mux_reg == -1) {
-			dev_err(ipctl->dev, "Pin(%s) does not support mux function\n",
+			dev_dbg(ipctl->dev, "Pin(%s) does not support mux function\n",
 				info->pins[pin_id].name);
-			return -EINVAL;
+			continue;
 		}
 
 		if (info->flags & SHARE_MUX_CONF_REG) {
-- 
2.4.9

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux