Re: [PATCH 12/17] pinctrl: uniphier: support pin configuration for dedicated pins

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> PH1-LD4 and PH1-sLD8 SoCs have pins that support pin configuration
> (pin biasing, drive strength control), but not pin-muxing.
>
> Allow to fill the mux value table with -1 for those pins; pins with
> mux value -1 will be skipped in the pin-mux set function.  The mux
> value type should be changed from "unsigned" to "int" in order to
> accommodate -1 as a special case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html