On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If a pin name is not specified in struct pinctrl_pin_desc, > pinctrl_register_one_pin() dynamically assigns its name. > So, desc->name is always a valid pointer here. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> That's definately true. Good catch, patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: do not care about blank pin name
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: do not care about blank pin name
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 10:20:34 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1464067586-20331-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl: do not care about blank pin name
- From: Masahiro Yamada
- [PATCH] pinctrl: do not care about blank pin name
- Prev by Date: Re: Moving pinctrl node under syscon for UniPhier pinctrl driver
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: copy per-pin driver private data to struct pin_desc
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: do not care about blank pin name
- Next by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: oxnas: Add GPIO get_direction
- Index(es):
 |