Hi Linus, On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 12:57 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Sylvain Lemieux > <slemieux.tyco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The "to_irq" functionality is broken inside this driver since commit > > 76ba59f8366f ("genirq: Add irq_domain-aware core IRQ handler"). > > > > The addition of the new lpc32xx irqchip driver in 4.7, fixed the > > lpc32xx platform interrupt issue. > > > > When switching to the new lpc32xx irqchip driver, a warning appear > > in the lpc32xx gpio driver: warning: "NR_IRQS" redefined. > > > > To remove this warning (temporary solution), this patch > > disables the broken "to_irq" mapping functionality support. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Patch applied for fixes with Vladimir's ACK. > > > * The final solution is to replace the existing lpc32xx gpio driver. > > This work is currently in progress; refer to the following URL: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/144696 > > Hm, I see that the ambition was to merge the new irqchip > driver and the new GPIO driver in the same merge window. > Sorry if I was being too lazy/picky/whatever about the patch(es) > I guess I didn't quite get the scope of this change. :( > The new LPC32xx GPIO driver can go in a separate merge window; another version of the patchset is required. For 4.7, the goal was to remove the broken dependency in the existing driver. > I should say that as long as we can agree that the new code > makes the kernel as a whole a better place, I am happy to > merge it. Sometimes also I need to zoom out from the GPIO > and pin control subsystem(s) and see the big picture. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij Sylvain Lemieux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html