Hi Lee,
On Thursday 28 April 2016 03:28 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
MAXIM Semiconductor's PMIC, MAX77620/MAX20024 has 8 GPIO pins
which also act as the special function in alternate mode. Also
there is configuration like push-pull, open drain, FPS timing
etc for these pins.
Add pin control driver to configure these parameters through
pin control APIs.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
It seems there is some mismatches on kernel-next and the mfd/for-next
for one of patch for generic function name.
/**
2016-04-01 pinctrl: Rename pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map to
pinctrl_utils_free_map Irina Tirdea 1 -1/+1
d32f7fd3bbc32732b094d938b95169521503a9fb (patch)
pinctrl: Rename pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map to pinctrl_utils_free_map
Rename pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map to pinctrl_utils_free_map, since
it does not depend on device tree despite the current name. This
will enforce a consistent naming in pinctr-utils.c and will make
it clear it can be called from outside device tree (e.g. from
ACPI handling code).
**/
But this is not there in MFD sub system.
In mfd tree
.dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map,
In kernel next
.dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,
I used APIs from the kernel-next.
+static const struct pinctrl_ops max77620_pinctrl_ops = {
+ .get_groups_count = max77620_pinctrl_get_groups_count,
+ .get_group_name = max77620_pinctrl_get_group_name,
+ .get_group_pins = max77620_pinctrl_get_group_pins,
+ .dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin,
+ .dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,
+};
If you see any issue on this patch, please drop this patch and we will
fix this later once the renamed change available all the places.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
