On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 08:56 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > When you resubmit patches (unless there is a significant change in the > patch) please always put accumulated tags after existing tags. Okay, I wasn't sure about that. Thanks for the clarification and I'll do so in the future. Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl-exynos5440: Use off-stack memory for pinctrl_gpio_range
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl-exynos5440: Use off-stack memory for pinctrl_gpio_range
- From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:04:21 +0930
- In-reply-to: <5717281A.70906@samsung.com>
- Organization: IBM OzLabs
- Reply-to: andrew@xxxxxxxx
- References:
- [PATCH v2] pinctrl-exynos5440: Use off-stack memory for pinctrl_gpio_range
- From: Andrew Jeffery
- Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl-exynos5440: Use off-stack memory for pinctrl_gpio_range
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- [PATCH v2] pinctrl-exynos5440: Use off-stack memory for pinctrl_gpio_range
- Prev by Date: [PATCH v9 3/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/8] STMPE fixes/rework and add STMPE1600 support
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl-exynos5440: Use off-stack memory for pinctrl_gpio_range
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl-exynos5440: Use off-stack memory for pinctrl_gpio_range
- Index(es):
 |