On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 03:27:49PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 07:10:36PM +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > > index 682070d20f00..6238ddb81709 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > > @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ int acpi_gpio_count(struct device *dev, const char *con_id) > > struct acpi_crs_lookup { > > struct list_head node; > > struct acpi_device *adev; > > - const char *con_id; > > + char *con_id; > > Why it cannot be left as const? I suppose it could. > > > }; > > > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_crs_lookup_lock); > > @@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ bool acpi_can_fallback_to_crs(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *con_id) > > lookup = kmalloc(sizeof(*lookup), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (lookup) { > > lookup->adev = adev; > > - lookup->con_id = con_id; > > + lookup->con_id = kstrdup(con_id, GFP_KERNEL); > > list_add_tail(&lookup->node, &acpi_crs_lookup_list); > > } > > } > > -- > > 2.7.4 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html