On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:35:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >I am a bit concerend that the newly introduced ISA_BUS is not automatically >enabled. Effectively this means that all drivers depending on it will >be disabled until someone enables ISA_BUS in the distribution. > >Is this a concern for anyone but me ? > >Anyway, since you are the driver maintainer, I assume that you are ok >with it, so > >Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Side note for Wim: ISA_BUS was introduced with commit b3c1be1b789c >("base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency") in -next. > >Guenter Since the ISA bus lacks standardized probing functionality, and the majority of ISA devices I've encountered expect the user to start writing to the device's I/O port addresses from the get-go, I think ISA_BUS should remain an explicit dependency rather than become selected when a user chooses a driver. That is to say, it is more appropriate for a user to explicitly enable ISA_BUS if their system has an ISA bus; otherwise a user may enable a driver with the expectation of a device probe, whereas the driver will simply start writing to I/O port addresses unexpectedly. William Breathitt Gray -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html