On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:25:26PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > My ack still applies to the whole series. > > I take it that I can just apply the v4 with your ACK on them. That's right. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Add pin control data structures
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Add pin control data structures
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 16:30:54 +0300
- In-reply-to: <CACRpkdZ0_qnm38xBRNQX-t9TbLgasoamOLraTLaTRk6amBUBhQ@mail.gmail.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
- References:
- [PATCH v3 0/6] Add pinctrl support for Baytrail
- From: Cristina Ciocan
- [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Add pin control data structures
- From: Cristina Ciocan
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Add pin control data structures
- From: Mika Westerberg
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Add pin control data structures
- From: Linus Walleij
- [PATCH v3 0/6] Add pinctrl support for Baytrail
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: handle probe deferrals better
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: handle probe deferrals better
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Add pin control data structures
- Next by thread: [PATCH v3 2/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Add pin control operations
- Index(es):
 |