On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > When firmware does not use _DSD properties that allow properly name GPIO > resources, the kernel falls back on parsing _CRS resources, and will > return entries described as GpioInt() as general purpose GPIOs even > though they are meant to be used simply as interrupt sources for the > device: Patch applied for fixes. Is this a regression so that I should also tag it for stable? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html