On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I wait for Geert to either queue this for his first v4.7 pull request >> or tell me to apply it for fixes. Is it a regression? > > I'm not aware of any issues due to this. OK just queue it with the rest. I assume there will still be lots of action in sh-pfc for this merge window. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:33:22 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CAMuHMdUbcJZmyXgRd3EyNi55b-Gwc-dN84TQNdFf3F5JxvOR5Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References:
- [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: tidyup IPSR/MOD_SEL/GPSR settings order
- From: Kuninori Morimoto
- [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx
- From: Kuninori Morimoto
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx
- From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven
- [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: tidyup IPSR/MOD_SEL/GPSR settings order
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: amdpt: Add a new ACPI HID
- Next by Date: Diagnosing ACPI trouble related to pinctr_cherryview on 4.4.x
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx
- Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl:Intel: make the high level interrupt working
- Index(es):
 |