2016-03-22 18:31 GMT+08:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Current code uses a uninitialized spin lock. >> bgpio_init() already initialized a spin lock, so let's switch to use >> &gc->bgpio_lock instead and remove the lock from struct men_z127_gpio. >> >> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Patch applied for the v4.7 cycle. Will not appear in -next until > after -rc1. Is it fine to use uninitialized spinlock? If not, this one should be for 4.6. Regards, Axel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html