Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > It's literally just the fact that "git merge" does it with no extra > flags or checks. I'd like people to have to be aware of what they are > doing when they merge two different projects, not do it by mistake. > > So making it conditional on a flag like "--no-common-root" is what I'd look for. I think I said essentially the same thing in a separate message; I am not sure "--no-common-root" is a good name, but I think it is better to be more explicit than tying this to a strategy. > I don't think the original "resolve" did it, for example. You can't do > a three-way merge without a base. Yes, and that continues to this day: # Give up if we are given two or more remotes -- not handling octopus. case "$remotes" in ?*' '?*) exit 2 ;; esac # Give up if this is a baseless merge. if test '' = "$bases" then exit 2 fi This is a tangent but I wonder if we should say why we refuse to the standard error before calling these two "exit"s. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html