On 03/10/2016 03:06 AM, Liu Gang wrote: > The ls1043a belongs to the Freescale QorIQ platform, and QorIQ > platform's gpio nodes should use compatible "fsl,qoriq-gpio". Why? I don't see any version register anything else in this block that could be used to identify potential differences from chip to chip. At the least, both compatibles should be present. Where is the binding for this? -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] gpio/ls1043a: Correct ls1043a gpio nodes compatible in dts file
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio/ls1043a: Correct ls1043a gpio nodes compatible in dts file
- From: Scott Wood <scott.wood@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:47:34 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: nxp.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;nxp.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nxp.com;
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
- Thread-topic: [PATCH] gpio/ls1043a: Correct ls1043a gpio nodes compatible in dts file
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH v4 13/13] ARM: sunxi: Add Kconfig for sunxi clocks
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] gpio/ls1043a: Correct ls1043a gpio nodes compatible in dts file
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio/ls1043a: Correct ls1043a gpio nodes compatible in dts file
- Index(es):
 |