Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Remove non existing irq's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:13:26AM +0100, Henry Paulissen wrote:
> While I was testing irq's on the cubietruck I found a couple of
> not working irq pins. Further diving into the problem it opened
> up a mess called "manual".
> 
> This so called manual (A20 user manual v1.3 dated 2014-10-10) says:
> 
> Pin overview:
>     Page 233:       EINT12 is on pin PC19 mux6.
>     Page 236:       EINT12 is on pin PH12 mux6.
> 
> Now, it is a bit strange to have the same IRQ on 2 different pins,
> but I guess this could still be possible hardware wise. But then:
> 
> Pin registers:
>     Page 253:       EINT12 is *not* on pin PC19.
>     Page 281:       EINT12 is on pin PH12.
> 
> The manual is so contradicting that further tests had to be made
> to see which of the 2 statements where correct.
> 
> This patch is based on actual outcome of these tests and not what
> the manual says.
> 
> Test procedure used:
> 
> Connect a 1 pulse per second (GPS) line to the pin.
> 
> echo pin### > /sys/class/gpio/export
> echo in > /sys/class/gpio/gpio###/direction
> echo rising > /sys/class/gpio/gpio###/edge
> 
> Check /proc/interrupts if a irq was attached and if irq's where
> received.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Henry Paulissen <henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux