On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Markus Pargmann <mpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The gpio-hogging DT bindings still seem perfectly fine for me: > > qe_pio_a: gpio-controller@1400 { > compatible = "fsl,qe-pario-bank-a", "fsl,qe-pario-bank"; > reg = <0x1400 0x18>; > gpio-controller; > #gpio-cells = <2>; > > line_b { > gpio-hog; > gpios = <6 0>; > output-low; > line-name = "foo-bar-gpio"; > }; > }; > > This could be something like this without hogging: > ... > line_b { > gpios = <6 0>; > line-name = "foo-bar-gpio"; > }; I agree. Didn't you even make a patch for this that we didn't merge because we didn't have a use case? (I have a memory problem, admittedly, too much people and patches flying around ...) If you rebase the patch that make it possible to simply name lines without hogging them, I'm certainly game for merging it. Enclosing a lsgpio sample output gives extra points. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html