Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] pinctrl: sunxi: Use pin number when calling sunxi_pmx_set

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Krzysztof Adamski <k@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 02:17:41PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Krzysztof Adamski <k@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> sunxi_pmx_set accepts pin number and then calculates offset by
>>> subtracting pin_base from it. sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_get, on the other hand,
>>> gets offset so we have to convert it to pin number so we won't get
>>> negative value in sunxi_pmx_set.
>>>
>>> This was only used on A10 so far, where there is only one GPIO chip with
>>> pin_base set to 0 so it didn't matter. However H3 also requires this
>>> workaround but have two pinmux sections, triggering problem for PL port.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Adamski <k@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> Waiting for Maxime to review this. I guess this patch can be merged
>> independently of the other patches?
>
> Yes it can but it won't have any effect, as stated in the commit message,
> since other SoCs either don't use this flag or have only one port so theri
> pin_base=0.

Who cares as long as it will be used eventually.

Merged v4 as stated earlier.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html