[PATCH] gpio: minor correction in docs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Since the doc example talk about two ranges of 10 gpio pins, I guess
the gpio-ranges count should be 10 in both definitions?

/Per
From 49759e85c30dae5884efd979f03be475e76ed7d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Per Hallsmark <per.hallsmark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:51:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: minor correction in docs

Signed-off-by: Per Hallsmark <per.hallsmark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
index 069cdf6..ad3d64b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ Example 1:
 		compatible = "fsl,qe-pario-bank-e", "fsl,qe-pario-bank";
 		reg = <0x1460 0x18>;
 		gpio-controller;
-		gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl1 0 20 10>, <&pinctrl2 10 50 20>;
+		gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl1 0 20 10>, <&pinctrl2 10 50 10>;
 	};
 
 Here, a single GPIO controller has GPIOs 0..9 routed to pin controller
-- 
2.5.0


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux