Hi Marc, Linus > Subject: Re: GPIO TODO Thanks for quick response. > > On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:00:16 +0000, > Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 8:38 AM Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > Besides the of_gpio.h, anyone working on immutable irq_chip? > > > > This work was initiated by Marc Zyngier and he has since had to > resign > > irqchip maintenance so it lands with Tomas Gleixner that has too > much > > to do (I think), but rest assured that he will be grateful if you pick > > it up, so just send patches. Thanks. I will give a look and see what I could do here. > > You of course still have the option to simply delete anything that is not > yet immutable, or remove the irq_chip patching support. The kernel > has been screaming for three years now, and these drivers are pretty > much unmaintained. I will do my best to add IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE support for remaining irq_chips created by gpio drivers. Removing the irq_chips from the gpio drivers that not-converted immutable irq chip(if you mean this) would be rejected, I think. Thanks, Peng. > > My bet is that nobody will notice, and I suspect tglx will gladly take > patches deleting unmaintained code. Once that's done, you can drop > the immutable flag, which won't serve any purpose anymore. > > M. > > -- > Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.