Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] gpio: elkhartlake: depend on MFD_INTEL_EHL_PSE_GPIO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 08:32:51PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:03:01PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 01:00:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 08:37:26AM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 10:52:28AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > > Now that we have Intel MFD driver for PSE GPIO, depend on it.
> > > 
> > > > Andy, any guidance on GPIO?
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure what we are waiting here from me. Hadn't I reviewed your GPIO
> > > part already?
> > 
> > Ah, I added MFD dependency for leaf drivers after your v1 review.
> > So this one seems missing the tag. Can I add it?
> 
> I see, but this can be added later on.
> And on the second thought, do we accept the configurations
> when user wants to have GPIO on EHL, and doesn't care about TIO?

Yes, here we're making the leaf driver (GPIO) depend on MFD regardless
of what TIO config is.

> Maybe this patch is not needed after all?

My understanding is that GPIO should depend on MFD. Not much point in
adding a standalone leaf driver right?

Raag




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux