Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] pinctrl: samsung: add gs101 specific eint suspend/resume callbacks

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/03/2025 12:39, Peter Griffin wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 at 11:31, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> Thanks for the review feedback.
>>
>> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 19:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/03/2025 11:29, Peter Griffin wrote:
>>>> gs101 differs to other SoCs in that fltcon1 register doesn't
>>>> always exist. Additionally the offset of fltcon0 is not fixed
>>>> and needs to use the newly added eint_fltcon_offset variable.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 4a8be01a1a7a ("pinctrl: samsung: Add gs101 SoC pinctrl configuration")
>>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> It looks this depends on previous commit, right?
>>
>> Yes that's right, it depends on the refactoring in the previous patch.
>> To fix the bug (which is an Serror on suspend for gs101), we need the
>> dedicated gs101 callback so it can have the knowledge that fltcon1
>> doesn't always exist and it's varying offset.
> 
> and also dependent on the first patch that adds the eint_fltcon_offset :)


That would be fine because it's a fix as well. Ah, well, let's keep the
dependency, but then I think syntax would be:

Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # depends on the previous three patches


Best regards,
Krzysztof