Re: [PATCH v7 03/11] dt-bindings: pci: Add common schema for devices accessible through PCI BARs

[Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi Rob,

On 08:32 Tue 11 Mar     , Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 4:21 PM Krzysztof Wilczynski <kw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > [...]
> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > > index d45c88955072..af2e4652bf3b 100644
> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -19752,6 +19752,7 @@ RASPBERRY PI RP1 PCI DRIVER
> > >  M:   Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@xxxxxxxx>
> > >  S:   Maintained
> > >  F:   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/raspberrypi,rp1-clocks.yaml
> > > +F:   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml
> > >  F:   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/raspberrypi,rp1-gpio.yaml
> > >  F:   include/dt-bindings/clock/rp1.h
> > >  F:   include/dt-bindings/misc/rp1.h
> >
> > I would be happy to pick this via the PCI tree as per the standard
> > operating procedure.  However, the MAINTAINERS changes do not exist
> > for us yet, and are added in the first patch of the series, which is
> > not ideal.
> >
> > I can add the missing dependency manually, but that would cause issues
> > for linux-next tree, which is also not ideal.
> >
> > I saw some review feedback, as such, when you are going to be sending
> > another version, can you make MAINTAINERS changes to be the last patch,
> > perhaps.  Basically, something standalone that perhaps whoever will pick
> > the misc patch could also pick and apply at the same time.
> >
> > Alternatively, someone else picking up the PCI dt-bindings would work, too.
> >
> > Your thoughts?
> 
> I guess I missed this in review, but why is a common schema buried in
> a device maintainer entry? Also, an entry in MAINTAINERS is redundant
> anyway because get_maintainers.pl can fetch maintainers from the
> schema file.

Oh nice, I've added all that .yaml entries in MAINTAINERS because I saw many
reference already existing there, so I was thinking that was a good behaviour.
Now I guess I can get rid of all .yaml references in MAINTAINERS file from all my
patches, since they will be solved automatically by get_mainatainer.pl... 
There's only one minor caveat though: I have a middle name, and it turns out
that get_maintainer.pl is skipping my first name. Unluckily I'm not a Perl guy
so I guess I have to dive a little bit in Perl regex and send a separate patch
for that.

Many thanks,
Andrea

> 
> Rob