Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] gpiolib: Rename gpio_set_debounce_timeout() to gpiod_do_set_debounce()

[Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:18:04AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 06:00:33PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > In order to reduce the 'gpio' namespace when operate over GPIO descriptor
> > > rename gpio_set_debounce_timeout() to gpiod_do_set_debounce().
> > 
> > To me anything that has '_do_' in their name sounds like an internal static
> > function that gets wrapped by the actual API function(s).
> > 
> > For instance it could be 
> > 
> >   int gpio_set_debounce_timeout()
> >   {
> >   	...
> > 	gpiod_do_set_debounce()
> > 	...
> > 
> > However, gpiod_set_debounce_timeout() or gpiod_set_debounce() sounds good
> > to me.
> 
> Then please propose the second name for gpiod_set_config_XXX to follow
> the same pattern. The series unifies naming and reduces the current
> inconsistency.

gpiod_set_config()?