Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] pinctrl: bcm2835: don't -EINVAL on alternate funcs from get_direction()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 11:27 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Since commit 9d846b1aebbe ("gpiolib: check the return value of
> gpio_chip::get_direction()") we check the return value of the
> get_direction() callback as per its API contract. This driver returns
> -EINVAL if the pin in question is set to one of the alternative
> (non-GPIO) functions. This isn't really an error that should be
> communicated to GPIOLIB so default to returning the "safe" value of
> INPUT in this case. The GPIO subsystem does not have the notion of
> "unknown" direction.
>
> Fixes: 9d846b1aebbe ("gpiolib: check the return value of gpio_chip::get_direction()")
> Reported-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z7VFB1nST6lbmBIo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>

Patch applied!

Yours,
Linus Walleij





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux