Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek: Add support for mt8196

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 03:11:41AM +0000, Cathy Xu (许华婷) wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 20:26 -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> > you have verified the sender or the content.
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:16:25 +0800, Cathy Xu wrote:
> > > Add the new binding document for pinctrl on MediaTek mt8196.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Guodong Liu <guodong.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Cathy Xu <ot_cathy.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt8196-pinctrl.yaml      | 241
> > > ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 241 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt8196-
> > > pinctrl.yaml
> > > 
> > 
> > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
> 
>   Sorry, this patch depond on another patch:
>   
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20250228011702.16493-3-ot_cathy.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
>   In this case, does the dt-binding still need go first? If so, I 

This means your series are non-bisectable but even re-ordering will nto
fix it. You understand you target different trees?

> will include the dependency information in the commit message of 
> the next version. Thank you~

No, decouple from dependencies.

Best regards,
Krzysztof