On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 2:22 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:56:23PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > During chip registration we should neither check the return value of > > gc->get_direction() nor hold the SRCU lock when calling it. The former > > is because pin controllers may have pins set to alternate functions and > > return errors from their get_direction() callbacks. That's alright - we > > should default to the safe INPUT state and not bail-out. The latter is > > not needed because we haven't registered the chip yet so there's nothing > > to protect against dynamic removal. In fact: we currently hit a lockdep > > splat. Revert to calling the gc->get_direction() callback directly not > > not checking its value. > > ... > > I think the below code deserves a commit (as a summary of the above commit > message). > Can you rephrase? I'm not getting this one. Bart > > + if (gc->get_direction && gpiochip_line_is_valid(gc, desc_index)) > > + assign_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags, > > + !gc->get_direction(gc, desc_index)); > > + else > > assign_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, > > &desc->flags, !gc->direction_input); > > Otherwise LGTM, > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >