On 24/02/2025 14:02, André Draszik wrote: > On Mon, 2025-02-24 at 06:48 -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote: >> >> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 10:28:49 +0000, André Draszik wrote: >>> Add device tree binding for the Maxim MAX77759 companion PMIC for USB >>> Type-C applications. >>> >>> The MAX77759 includes Battery Charger, Fuel Gauge, temperature sensors, >>> USB Type-C Port Controller (TCPC), NVMEM, and a GPIO expander. >>> >>> This describes the core mfd device. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77759.yaml | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>> MAINTAINERS | 6 ++ >>> 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+) >>> >> >> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch: >> >> yamllint warnings/errors: >> >> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: >> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77759.example.dtb: pmic@66: gpio: False schema >> does not allow {'compatible': ['maxim,max77759-gpio'], 'gpio-controller': True, '#gpio-cells': 2, 'interrupt-controller': True, >> '#interrupt-cells': 2} >> from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/maxim,max77759.yaml# >> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77759.example.dtb: pmic@66: pmic-nvmem: False >> schema does not allow {'compatible': ['maxim,max77759-nvmem'], 'nvmem-layout': {'compatible': ['fixed-layout'], '#address-cells': 1, >> '#size-cells': 1, 'reboot-mode@0': {'reg': [[0, 4]]}, 'boot-reason@4': {'reg': [[4, 4]]}, 'shutdown-user-flag@8': {'reg': [[8, 1]]}, >> 'rsoc@10': {'reg': [[10, 2]]}}} >> from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/maxim,max77759.yaml# >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77759.example.dtb: /example-0/i2c/pmic@66/gpio: failed to match any schema with >> compatible: ['maxim,max77759-gpio'] >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77759.example.dtb: /example-0/i2c/pmic@66/pmic-nvmem: failed to match any schema with >> compatible: ['maxim,max77759-nvmem'] > > The top-level example in here references the two (MFD cell) > bindings added in the two follow-up patches for gpio and > nvmem. When all three binding patches exist in the tree, > the errors are gone. > > Is this acceptable, or shall I add the top-level example only > after the bindings? Not sure if I follow - do you confirm that it is bisectable or it is not? If not, then it has to be fixed. Best regards, Krzysztof