Hi Kent, On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 02:49, Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > TBH, I think you will have trouble getting users to adopt it - they > require a solution no more complex than what they already have or they > will resist the change for as long as they possibly can. So if you want > them to migrate before removing the global numberspace then that will > never happen. > > As it stands the user needs to search the gpiochipXYZs looking for the > matching label. It would be easier if the chip was identified in sysfs by > its label, rather than (as well as) its base address. > So no searching required. > > Aside: Speaking of which, once the global numberspace is removed does > exposing the base address serve any purpose? l doubt the global numberspace will really go away: some number scheme is still needed internally, cfr. I2C bus numbers and virtual interrupts numbers. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds