Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: use the required minimum set of headers

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 5:00 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 01:30:01PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for taking my suggestion into account!
>
> > Andy suggested we should keep a fine-grained scheme for includes and
> > only pull in stuff required within individual ifdef sections. Let's
> > revert commit dea69f2d1cc8 ("gpiolib: move all includes to the top of
> > gpio/consumer.h") and make the headers situation even more fine-grained
> > by only including the first level headers containing requireded symbols
> > except for bug.h where checkpatch.pl warns against including asm/bug.h.
>
> I'm not sure we should consider the checkpatch.pl in this case.
>
> ...
>
> This change is definitely an improvement from the current state in your
> gpio/for-next branch, if you are really strong about linux/bug.h, let me more
> time to check that header and see if there any potential issues.
>

Sure, take your time. For some reason checkpatch does recommend using
linux/foo.h over asm/foo.h if the former includes the latter but I
don't know the history of this.

Bart