Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] gpio: regmap: Make use of 'ngpios' property

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 03:11:04PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 3:07 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:42:26PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 2:41 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 03:40:15PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:22:29PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 2:18 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:

...

> > > > > > > Bart, do you think it can be applied?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Andy,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I really rarely lose track of patches. It's been just under a week
> > > > > > since this was posted. Please don't ping me to pick things up unless
> > > > > > I'm not reacting for at least two weeks. I typically leave patches on
> > > > > > the list for some time to give bots some time to react.
> > > > >
> > > > > I see, I thought your cadence is one week, that's why I have pinged you.
> > > > > Will try to keep this in mind for the future and sorry to interrupt!
> > > >
> > > > Btw, if it's easier to you, I can just combine this to my usual PR to you.
> > >
> > > No, that's fine, let's stick to ACPI-only PRs.
> >
> > Hmm... Is the Intel GPIO stuff should go directly to your tree? Seems I missed
> > some changes in the flow...
> 
> Ah, no, sure, intel and ACPI and whatever you did up until this point.

Got it, thanks!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko