Re: [RESEND v3 2/2] pinctrl: mediatek: adapt to multi-base design

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2025-01-27 at 12:48 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> Il 25/01/25 03:51, Hao Chang ha scritto:
> > The eint num will obtain the operation address through pins.
> > Change the traversal method of irq handle from traversing a set of
> > registers to traversing one by one.
> > 
> > Change-Id: I3962b78042d32501a73153201cddf52c6b62a695
> > Signed-off-by: Hao Chang <ot_chhao.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Qingliang Li <qingliang.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> > -----
> >   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> > b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> > index 540245c3128d..949a20196f74 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> > @@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_eint_find_irq);
> >   int mtk_eint_do_init(struct mtk_eint *eint)
> >   {
> >       unsigned int size, i, port;
> > +     struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = (struct mtk_pinctrl *)eint->pctl;
> > 
> >       /* If clients don't assign a specific regs, let's use generic
> > one */
> >       if (!eint->regs)
> > @@ -523,11 +524,11 @@ int mtk_eint_do_init(struct mtk_eint *eint)
> >       if (!eint->base_pin_num)
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> > 
> > -     if (!eint->pins) {
> > +     if (eint->nbase == 1) {
> >               size = eint->hw->ap_num * sizeof(struct
> > mtk_eint_pin);
> >               eint->pins = devm_kmalloc(eint->dev, size,
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> >               if (!eint->pins)
> > -                     return -ENOMEM;
> > +                     goto err_eint;
> > 
> >               eint->base_pin_num[0] = eint->hw->ap_num;
> >               for (i = 0; i < eint->hw->ap_num; i++) {
> > @@ -536,34 +537,29 @@ int mtk_eint_do_init(struct mtk_eint *eint)
> >                       eint->pins[i].debounce = (i < eint->hw-
> > >db_cnt) ? 1 : 0;
> >               }
> >       } else {
> > +             eint->pins = hw->soc->eint_pin;
> >               for (i = 0; i < eint->hw->ap_num; i++)
> >                       eint->base_pin_num[eint->pins[i].instance]++;
> >       }
> > 
> >       eint->wake_mask = devm_kmalloc(eint->dev, eint->nbase *
> > sizeof(u32 *), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -     if (!eint->wake_mask)
> > -             return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> >       eint->cur_mask = devm_kmalloc(eint->dev, eint->nbase *
> > sizeof(u32 *), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -     if (!eint->wake_mask)
> > -             return -ENOMEM;
> 
> This error checking was fine. Please keep it correct.
> 
> if (!eint->wake_mask) {
>         ret = -ENOMEM;
>         goto err_wake_mask_alloc;
> }
> 
> and
> 
> if (!eint->cur_mask) {
>         ret = -ENOMEM;
>         goto err_cur_mask_alloc;
> }
> 
> > +     if (!eint->wake_mask || !eint->wake_mask)
> > +             goto err_eint;
> > 
> >       for (i = 0; i < eint->nbase; i++) {
> >               port = (eint->base_pin_num[i] + 31) / 32;
> >               eint->wake_mask[i] = devm_kzalloc(eint->dev, port *
> > sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -             if (!eint->wake_mask[i])
> > -                     return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> >               eint->cur_mask[i] = devm_kzalloc(eint->dev, port *
> > sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -             if (!eint->cur_mask[i])
> > -                     return -ENOMEM;
> > +             if (!eint->cur_mask[i] || !eint->wake_mask[i])
> > +                     goto err_eint;
> 
> same here
> 
> >       }
> > 
> >       eint->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(eint->dev->of_node,
> >                                            eint->hw->ap_num,
> >                                            &irq_domain_simple_ops,
> > NULL);
> >       if (!eint->domain)
> > -             return -ENOMEM;
> > +             goto err_eint;
> > 
> >       if (eint->hw->db_time) {
> >               for (i = 0; i < MTK_EINT_DBNC_MAX; i++)
> > @@ -585,6 +581,22 @@ int mtk_eint_do_init(struct mtk_eint *eint)
> >                                        eint);
> > 
> >       return 0;
> > +
> > +err_eint:
> > +     for (i = 0; i < eint->nbase; i++) {
> > +             if (eint->wake_mask[i])
> > +                     devm_kfree(eint->dev, eint->wake_mask[i]);
> > +             if (eint->cur_mask[i])
> > +                     devm_kfree(eint->dev, eint->cur_mask[i]);
> > +     }
> > +     if (eint->cur_mask)
> > +             devm_kfree(eint->dev, eint->cur_mask);
> > +     if (eint->wake_mask)
> > +             devm_kfree(eint->dev, eint->wake_mask);
> > +     if (eint->nbase == 1)
> > +             devm_kfree(eint->dev, eint->pins);
> > +     devm_kfree(eint->dev, eint->base_pin_num);
> 
> ...and you should only kfree what was successfully allocated before.
Thanks,I will fix this isssue.
> 
> Regards,
> Angelo
> 
> > +     return -ENOMEM;
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_eint_do_init);
> > 
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux