On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 01:11:57PM +0100, Alexis GUILLEMET wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 08:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Tested-by: Alexis GUILLEMET<alexis.guillemet@xxxxxxxxxxx> Thank you for confirming, I'm going to push this to my review and testing queue soon. It should appear in the next (v6.15-rc1) Linux kernel. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: intel: Fix wrong bypass assignment in intel_pinctrl_probe_pwm()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: intel: Fix wrong bypass assignment in intel_pinctrl_probe_pwm()
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:17:49 +0200
- In-reply-to: <ea58e549-a1ba-4508-8a70-59622f8c3ce3@dunasys.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20250210195230.490904-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20250210195230.490904-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <ea58e549-a1ba-4508-8a70-59622f8c3ce3@dunasys.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 0/2] pinctrl: intel: Fix PWM initialisation
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: intel: Fix wrong bypass assignment in intel_pinctrl_probe_pwm()
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 0/2] pinctrl: intel: Fix PWM initialisation
- Prev by Date: Re: small brainstorm for the problem I have
- Next by Date: Re: [External] - [PATCH libgpiod v3 11/16] doc: provide sphinx docs for the core C API and C++ bindings
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: intel: Fix wrong bypass assignment in intel_pinctrl_probe_pwm()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] pinctrl: intel: Fix PWM initialisation
- Index(es):
 |