On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:13:23 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 12:48 AM David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Reduce verbosity by using gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep() instead of > > gpiod_set_array_value(). > > > > These are not called in an atomic context, so changing to the cansleep > > variant is fine. > > ... > > > if (st->gpio_os) { > > - gpiod_set_array_value(st->gpio_os->ndescs, > > - st->gpio_os->desc, st->gpio_os->info, os); > > + gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep(st->gpio_os, os); > > } > > Now I do not see any justification to leave {}. > With that tidied up (good spot!) if this goes through the GPIO tree Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>