On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 09:46:31AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 6:57 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > /** > > - * for_each_hwgpio - Iterates over all GPIOs for given chip. > > + * for_each_hwgpio_in_range - Iterates over all GPIOs in a given range > > * @_chip: Chip to iterate over. > > * @_i: Loop counter. > > + * @_base: First GPIO in the ranger. > > + * @_size: Amount of GPIOs to check starting from @base. > > * @_label: Place to store the address of the label if the GPIO is requested. > > * Set to NULL for unused GPIOs. > > */ > > -#define for_each_hwgpio(_chip, _i, _label) \ > > +#define for_each_hwgpio_in_range(_chip, _i, _base, _size, _label) \ > > for (CLASS(_gpiochip_for_each_data, _data)(&_label, &_i); \ > > - *_data.i < _chip->ngpio; \ > > + *_data.i < _size; \ > > (*_data.i)++, kfree(*(_data.label)), *_data.label = NULL) \ > > if (IS_ERR(*_data.label = \ > > - gpiochip_dup_line_label(_chip, *_data.i))) {} \ > > + gpiochip_dup_line_label(_chip, _base + *_data.i))) {} \ > > else > > Can you add a kerneldoc here as well, please? Sure, but it will duplicate the above. > > +#define for_each_hwgpio(_chip, _i, _label) \ > > + for_each_hwgpio_in_range(_chip, _i, 0, _chip->ngpio, _label) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko