On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 4:31 AM Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] scmi: Bypass set fwnode and introduce > > allow/block list to address devlink issue > > Any comments on this patchset? The pinctrl changes look OK to me so for those 2 patches: Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> in case you want to merge it through some other tree. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] scmi: Bypass set fwnode and introduce allow/block list to address devlink issue
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] scmi: Bypass set fwnode and introduce allow/block list to address devlink issue
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:07:37 +0100
- In-reply-to: <PAXPR04MB845925677F9AB860552A421988F42@PAXPR04MB8459.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
- References: <20250120-scmi-fwdevlink-v2-0-3af2fa37dbac@nxp.com> <PAXPR04MB845925677F9AB860552A421988F42@PAXPR04MB8459.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [libgpiod][PATCH 1/1] dbus: manager: fix linker not finding libgpiod.so
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: pinconf-generic: Print unsigned value if a format is registered
- Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH v2 0/4] scmi: Bypass set fwnode and introduce allow/block list to address devlink issue
- Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: amplifiers: add ADA4255
- Index(es):
 |