On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 03:13:29PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c > index 2c853c84b58f530898057e4ab274ba76070de05e..7850eb7710f499888d32aebf5d99df63db8bfa26 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c > @@ -344,6 +344,21 @@ static void __scmi_device_destroy(struct scmi_device *scmi_dev) > device_unregister(&scmi_dev->dev); > } > > +static int > +__scmi_device_set_node(struct scmi_device *scmi_dev, struct device_node *np, > + int protocol, const char *name) > +{ > + /* cpufreq device does not need to be supplier from devlink perspective */ > + if ((protocol == SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF) && !strcmp(name, "cpufreq")) { I don't love this... It seems like an hack. Could we put a flag somewhere instead? Perhaps in scmi_device? (I'm just saying that because that's what we're passing to this function). regards, dan carpenter