On 12/22/2015 06:13 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1]. We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern. Cc: Brunner Michael <Michael.Brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--- drivers/gpio/gpio-kempld.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-kempld.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-kempld.c index 35dd1e0af364..297f849af725 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-kempld.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-kempld.c @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static int kempld_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) = container_of(chip, struct kempld_gpio_data, chip); struct kempld_device_data *pld = gpio->pld; - return kempld_gpio_get_bit(pld, KEMPLD_GPIO_LVL_NUM(offset), offset); + return !!kempld_gpio_get_bit(pld, KEMPLD_GPIO_LVL_NUM(offset), offset); } static void kempld_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
