On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 05:10:07PM GMT, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 1:26 PM Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 06:22:50PM GMT, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > > > I too think a-1 is the best option. However, I'd go for line0, line1 > > > etc. convention as for computers it doesn't make any difference while > > > for humans it's more readable. > > > > Thank you for the comments. I’ll address your feedbacks and send "v2" > > later, Since we seem to agree on the overall approach, I’ll send it as > > [PATCH v1] (i.e., without the "RFC"). > > > > No, please don't. It'll be confusing. The RFC WAS the v1. Next > iteration must be v2 with a changelog. Ok, I'll send it as v2. Thanks! -Koichiro > > Bartosz